From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: matt mooney Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:15:21 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/20] m68knommu: change to new flag variables Message-Id: <20100929231521.GA21930@haskell.muteddisk.com> List-Id: References: <1285224645-29728-1-git-send-email-mfm@muteddisk.com> <4CA18E00.7090207@snapgear.com> <20100928071606.GA13303@haskell.muteddisk.com> <4CA34F0B.6010605@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <4CA34F0B.6010605@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Michal Marek Cc: Greg Ungerer , Greg Ungerer , Andrew Morton , David Howells , Tim Abbott , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org On 16:36 Wed 29 Sep , Michal Marek wrote: > On 28.9.2010 09:16, matt mooney wrote: > > My original intent was through the maintainer trees; however, I am starting to > > realize that it probably would have been best to all go into the kbuild tree as > > one patch series. That being said, some people have picked them up and others > > have just acked, so really whatever is easiest for you. All unapplied will > > eventually go through the kbuild tree. > > Please try push as much through maintainer trees as possible, to avoid > unnecessary merge conflicts. Of course, if you end up with some patches > that nobody is picking up, I'll apply them to the kbuild tree. Okay, if anybody else asks, I will definitely ask them kindly to pick them up. There are, however, some patches that will need to go through the kbuild tree because some maintainers have already acked the patches and not picked them up. I will wait a couple more weeks, and then I will resend to you and the kbuild list with all acks added. -mfm