From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe
<jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rolandd-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Hal Rosenstock
<hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [patch] infiniband: uverbs: limit the number of entries
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:59:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101007165947.GD11681@bicker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101007161649.GD21206-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:16:49AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 09:16:10AM +0200, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > If we don't limit cmd.ne then the multiplications can overflow. This
> > will allocate a small amount of RAM successfully for the "resp" and
> > "wc" buffers. The heap will get corrupted when we call ib_poll_cq().
>
> I think you could cap the number of returned entries to
> UVERBS_MAX_NUM_ENTRIES rather than return EINVAL. That might be more
> compatible with user space..
>
Good idea. I don't actually have this hardware, so I can't test it, but
that definitely sounds reasonable.
If we did that then UVERBS_MAX_NUM_ENTRIES could be lower than 1000.
What is a reasonable number?
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-07 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-07 7:16 [patch] infiniband: uverbs: limit the number of entries Dan Carpenter
2010-10-07 16:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <20101007161649.GD21206-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2010-10-07 16:59 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2010-10-08 7:59 ` Nicolas Palix
[not found] ` <AANLkTin5zou2JHsdDyhGESuxyPonOs3kLo9Th0vg-kd8-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-10-08 14:25 ` [patch v2] " Dan Carpenter
2010-10-09 23:16 ` [patch] " Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <20101009231607.GA24649-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2010-10-12 11:31 ` [patch v3] infiniband: uverbs: handle large " Dan Carpenter
2010-10-12 21:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <20101012210118.GR24268-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2010-10-13 9:05 ` Dan Carpenter
2010-10-13 9:13 ` [patch v4] " Dan Carpenter
2010-11-23 7:10 ` Dan Carpenter
2010-11-24 22:07 ` Roland Dreier
[not found] ` <adahbf6gytv.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2010-11-24 22:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <20101124221845.GH2369-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2010-11-25 4:05 ` Roland Dreier
[not found] ` <adad3pugi90.fsf-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2010-11-25 4:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101007165947.GD11681@bicker \
--to=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rolandd-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox