From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Josh Triplett <josh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] OSS: soundcard: locking bug in sound_ioctl()
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:13:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010111013.28952.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201010102039.34858.arnd@arndb.de>
On Sunday 10 October 2010 20:39:34 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday 10 October 2010 19:33:52 Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > We shouldn't return directly here because we're still holding the
> > &soundcard_mutex.
> >
> > This bug goes all the way back to the start of git. It's strange that
> > no one has complained about it as a runtime bug.
> >
> > CC: stable@kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
>
> It was only recently converted to a mutex from the BKL, which is much
> more friendly to misusage because it is automatically released when
> the kernel sleeps or when the program exits.
>
> The behavior was already broken with the BKL but the problem was far
> less visible. I fear we might be seeing more of these as fallout from
> the BKL removal. Sparse should be able to detect most of these cases
> though, so maybe we can look more carefully for them.
Hmm, actually sparse does *not* warn about sound_ioctl returning in
different lock contexts. Sparse developers: is there a known limitation
in sparse for this? I expected to see context warnings because
sound_ioctl normally releases soundcard_mutex (previously lock_kernel)
in some cases returns while holding the lock.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-11 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-10 17:33 [patch 1/2] OSS: soundcard: locking bug in sound_ioctl() Dan Carpenter
2010-10-10 18:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-11 8:13 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2010-10-11 8:50 ` Johannes Berg
2010-10-11 10:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-11 10:52 ` Johannes Berg
2010-10-11 18:54 ` Josh Triplett
2010-10-11 20:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-11 22:23 ` Josh Triplett
2010-10-12 6:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-12 6:43 ` Josh Triplett
2010-10-11 11:59 ` Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201010111013.28952.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox