public inbox for kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Josh Triplett <josh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] OSS: soundcard: locking bug in sound_ioctl()
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:13:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010111013.28952.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201010102039.34858.arnd@arndb.de>

On Sunday 10 October 2010 20:39:34 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday 10 October 2010 19:33:52 Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > We shouldn't return directly here because we're still holding the
> > &soundcard_mutex.
> > 
> > This bug goes all the way back to the start of git.  It's strange that
> > no one has complained about it as a runtime bug.
> > 
> > CC: stable@kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> 
> It was only recently converted to a mutex from the BKL, which is much
> more friendly to misusage because it is automatically released when
> the kernel sleeps or when the program exits.
> 
> The behavior was already broken with the BKL but the problem was far
> less visible. I fear we might be seeing more of these as fallout from
> the BKL removal. Sparse should be able to detect most of these cases
> though, so maybe we can look more carefully for them.
 
Hmm, actually sparse does *not* warn about sound_ioctl returning in
different lock contexts. Sparse developers: is there a known limitation
in sparse for this? I expected to see context warnings because
sound_ioctl normally releases soundcard_mutex (previously lock_kernel)
in some cases returns while holding the lock.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-11  8:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-10 17:33 [patch 1/2] OSS: soundcard: locking bug in sound_ioctl() Dan Carpenter
2010-10-10 18:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-11  8:13   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2010-10-11  8:50     ` Johannes Berg
2010-10-11 10:50       ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-11 10:52         ` Johannes Berg
2010-10-11 18:54           ` Josh Triplett
2010-10-11 20:42             ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-11 22:23               ` Josh Triplett
2010-10-12  6:39                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-12  6:43                   ` Josh Triplett
2010-10-11 11:59 ` Takashi Iwai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201010111013.28952.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox