From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:22:03 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: select: fix information leak to userspace Message-Id: <20101123.122203.260090992.davem@davemloft.net> List-Id: References: <4CEBD37E.5060107@bfs.de> <203E1F2A-2D04-4B7F-8D1B-9DC24522CB5E@dilger.ca> <20101123121840.e9d17d91.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20101123121840.e9d17d91.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, wharms@bfs.de, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, segoon@openwall.com, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jakub@redhat.com From: Andrew Morton Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:18:40 -0800 > We can't reasonably address this with gcc changes. If gcc starts doing > what we want in the next release, how long will it be until that > release is the *oldest* version of gcc which the kernel may be compiled > with? Five years? Completely agreed.