From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
Tiago Vignatti <tiago.vignatti@nokia.com>,
Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpu: vga: limit kmalloc'ed memory size
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:33:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101124183300.GA31411@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101123124600.4401ea43.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:46 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> What I'm suggesting is that we simply do
>
> kbuf = strndup_user(buf, count);
>
> and make strndup_user() do the right thing if `count' turned out to be
> crazy large. THis way we don't have to sprinkle decisions about "crazy
> largeness" all over the kernel.
>
> And the way in which I suggest that strndup_user() decides whether the
> length is too great is to try to kmalloc that amount of memory.
> If it succeeds then fine, proceed.
I don't think that it is a good idea - the process would have an ability
to allocate too much system memory bypassing any limits. Assuming that
the kernel would only double the memory is not right - even if the
process is limited in physical memory it may pass address of e.g. mapped file.
Also this specific driver is happy with very low limit of copied string.
> If it fails then return an error,
> probably ENOMEM.
It is already done in strndup_user().
> And that attempt to invoke kmalloc() shouldn't spew a
> warning.
It is not obvious for me to change strndup_user's behaviour, I'm not
familiar with this code.
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-24 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-22 17:11 [PATCH v2] gpu: vga: limit kmalloc'ed memory size Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-11-22 18:09 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-23 19:08 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-11-23 20:46 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-24 18:33 ` Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101124183300.GA31411@albatros \
--to=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiago.vignatti@nokia.com \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox