From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 04:49:52 +0000 Subject: Re: Janitor-Question: use __set_bit instead of |= Message-Id: <20110531044952.GB31219@kroah.com> List-Id: References: <201105302323.43979.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <201105302323.43979.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:23:40PM +0200, Peter H=FCwe wrote: > Hi Janitors, staging-list >=20 > what is your opinion on using set_bit instead of using |=3D to set a bit? > Is it worth the effort to convert existing |=3D to set_bit? I doubt converting existing stuff is needed, but any future stuff is always nice to use set_bit() for the reasons you suggest. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html