From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 08:51:31 +0000 Subject: Re: [patch] w1: off by one in w1_f29_remove_slave() Message-Id: <20110730085131.GE5575@shale.localdomain> List-Id: References: <20110727095557.GL3824@shale.localdomain> <9C2475AA-829E-4BB8-A3D2-2444803A33D3@gmail.com> <4E33C3F5.9000602@bfs.de> In-Reply-To: <4E33C3F5.9000602@bfs.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: walter harms Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jean-Fran=E7ois?= Dagenais , Evgeniy Polyakov , Andrew Morton , open list , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:42:29AM +0200, walter harms wrote: > Is there any reason to release the data "backwards" ? > The default way is to go upwards. that looks more readable. I considered doing it that way. It would work. I throught maybe they were going to add something where it needed to be unwound LIFO order. I'll wait for Jean-Fran=E7oisto say which way is prefered. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html