From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] ipw2x00: signedness bug handling frame length
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 06:34:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120112063449.GA2408@elgon.mountain> (raw)
This is basically just a cleanup. Large positive numbers get counted as
negative but then get implicitly cast to positive again for the checks
that matter.
This does make a small difference in ipw_handle_promiscuous_rx() when we
test "if (unlikely((len + IPW_RX_FRAME_SIZE) > skb_tailroom(rxb->skb)))"
It should return there, but we don't return until a couple lines later
when we test "if (len > IPW_RX_BUF_SIZE - sizeof(struct ipw_rt_hdr)) {".
The difference is that in the second test the sizeof() means that there
is an implied cast to unsigned.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c
index 018a8de..4fcdac6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c
@@ -7848,7 +7848,7 @@ static void ipw_handle_data_packet_monitor(struct ipw_priv *priv,
* more efficiently than we can parse it. ORDER MATTERS HERE */
struct ipw_rt_hdr *ipw_rt;
- short len = le16_to_cpu(pkt->u.frame.length);
+ unsigned short len = le16_to_cpu(pkt->u.frame.length);
/* We received data from the HW, so stop the watchdog */
dev->trans_start = jiffies;
@@ -8023,7 +8023,7 @@ static void ipw_handle_promiscuous_rx(struct ipw_priv *priv,
s8 signal = frame->rssi_dbm - IPW_RSSI_TO_DBM;
s8 noise = (s8) le16_to_cpu(frame->noise);
u8 rate = frame->rate;
- short len = le16_to_cpu(pkt->u.frame.length);
+ unsigned short len = le16_to_cpu(pkt->u.frame.length);
struct sk_buff *skb;
int hdr_only = 0;
u16 filter = priv->prom_priv->filter;
next reply other threads:[~2012-01-12 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-12 6:34 Dan Carpenter [this message]
2012-01-13 10:29 ` [patch] ipw2x00: signedness bug handling frame length Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-01-13 10:36 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120112063449.GA2408@elgon.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox