From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 07:45:26 +0000 Subject: [patch] xfrm6: remove unneeded NULL check in __xfrm6_output() Message-Id: <20120201074526.GC22179@elgon.mountain> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "David S. Miller" , steffen.klassert@secunet.com Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov , James Morris , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , Patrick McHardy , netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org We don't check for NULL consistently in __xfrm6_output(). If "x" were NULL here it would lead to an OOPs later. I asked Steffen Klassert about this and he suggested that we remove the NULL check. On 10/29/11, Steffen Klassert wrote: >> net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c >> 148 >> 149 if ((x && x->props.mode = XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL) && >> ^ > > x can't be null here. It would be a bug if __xfrm6_output() is called > without a xfrm_state attached to the skb. I think we can just remove > this null check. Cc: Steffen Klassert Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c index 4eeff89..8755a30 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c +++ b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static int __xfrm6_output(struct sk_buff *skb) return -EMSGSIZE; } - if ((x && x->props.mode = XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL) && + if (x->props.mode = XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL && ((skb->len > mtu && !skb_is_gso(skb)) || dst_allfrag(skb_dst(skb)))) { return ip6_fragment(skb, x->outer_mode->afinfo->output_finish);