From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 06:13:51 +0000 Subject: Re: [patch] ext4: potential NULL dereference on error Message-Id: <20120515061351.GI16984@mwanda> List-Id: References: <20120513144104.GA21998@elgon.mountain> <20120514222535.GW5353@quack.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20120514222535.GW5353@quack.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jan Kara Cc: Theodore Ts'o , Andreas Dilger , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:25:35AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Sun 13-05-12 17:41:04, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > @@ -508,7 +509,8 @@ fallback_retry: > > for (i = 0; i < ngroups; i++) { > > grp = (parent_group + i) % ngroups; > > desc = ext4_get_group_desc(sb, grp, NULL); > > - grp_free = ext4_free_inodes_count(sb, desc); > > + if (desc) > > + grp_free = ext4_free_inodes_count(sb, desc); > > if (desc && grp_free && grp_free >= avefreei) { > So you it would be more logical to do: > if (desc) { > grp_free = ext4_free_inodes_count(sb, desc); > if (grp_free && grpfree >= avefreei) { > *group = grp; > return 0; > } > } > > Wouldn't it? Yeah. You're obviously right. I'll resend. regards, dan carpenter