From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 06:44:32 +0000 Subject: Re: [patch] sgi-xp: nested calls to spin_lock_irqsave() Message-Id: <20120629064432.GM3007@mwanda> List-Id: References: <20120627135155.GA3464@sgi.com> <20120628150342.aaa4ad2d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20120628150342.aaa4ad2d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andrew Morton Cc: Robin Holt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Jack Steiner This is actually my patch, so the patch description is my fault. It's a static checker patch and I don't have the hardware, but the changelog could have been written more clearly as well. Robin, the trick to resending patches is to put a: From: Dan Carpenter before the patch description and then it shows up as mine. Also, btw, Robin, I'm looking through my mailbox again and you did respond to the patch the first time I sent it. Sorry, that I didn't see that before, and thanks for your help on this. regards, dan carpenter