From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fengguang Wu Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 23:53:02 +0000 Subject: Re: [digsig:next-ima-module 13/36] {standard input}:5: Error: file not found: pubkey.pem.bin Message-Id: <20120803235302.GA6871@localhost> List-Id: References: <1344037447.2742.17.camel@falcor> In-Reply-To: <1344037447.2742.17.camel@falcor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Hi Mimi, On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 07:44:07PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 07:08 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Hi Mimi, > > > > Kernel build failed on > > > > tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kasatkin/linux-digsig.git next-ima-module > > head: 31baf831da8f67a11c14de7989bf68551396b356 > > commit: d396af8b7f5b9a72b15470284ca13aac1372e9d9 [13/36] integrity: create and inititialize a keyring with builtin public key > > config: x86_64-allmodconfig (attached as .config) > > > > Build errors: > > > > {standard input}:5: Error: file not found: pubkey.pem.bin > > Hi Fengguang, > > Congratulations on receiving an invitation to the kernel summit! Thank you! :) > I really appreciate your running tests on the different trees, but > Dmitry and I are still working on the next-ima-modules and > next-ima-directory branches. Instead of pushing out a branch to show > Dmitry the patches, I sent him a tar, so that I wouldn't get dinged for > build issues. We haven't finalized the patch content or ordering yet. > > We need some sort of mechanism that allows us to collaborate. What do > you think if Dmitry and I suffix a branch with 'test' until we're ready? Hmm, the problem is, some other people also have a 'test' suffix in the branch name w/o the intention to skip the auto builds.. For a topic branch that is currently in heavy development and will become testable eventually, you may temporarily carry a line Dont-Auto-Build in any of the branch's commits (in the changelog). Then my script will skip that branch automatically. Does this scheme sound good to you? Thanks, Fengguang