From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [wireless-testing:master 68/100] drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:291:15: warning: comparison o
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 10:41:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120811104133.GA9132@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201208111229.35167.chunkeey@googlemail.com>
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 12:29:34PM +0200, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> On Saturday 11 August 2012 11:59:51 Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:49:47AM +0200, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> > > On Saturday 11 August 2012 10:44:04 Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > > Hi Christian,
> > > >
> > > > FYI, there are new compile warnings show up in
> > >
> > > Thanks for telling me. Are these "normal" gcc's warnings
> > > for PPC? Because the usual C=2 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
> > > doesn't show anything (on a x86 no cross-compile).
> >
> > Yes, I don't use any special flags.
> >
> > > > tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-testing.git master
> > > > head: 0eba6e668abe4e0760d9d5e20921cc6000a77a85
> > > > commit: 9bc63816be9bf504414d350e605a4b30f857907d [68/100] p54: parse output power table
> > > > config: powerpc-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> > > >
> > > > All error/warnings:
> > > >
> > > > drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c: In function 'p54_get_maxpower':
> > > > drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:291:15: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [enabled by default]
> > > > drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:292:15: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [enabled by default]
> > > > drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:293:15: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [enabled by default]
> > > > drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:294:15: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [enabled by default]
> > >
> > > interesting, rawpower is declared as u16.
> > > whereas le16_to_cpu returns a __u16.
> > > (is that all, or is there something I don't see?)
> > >
> > > Anyway, since you are currently the only person
> > > I know, would you mind telling me if either (or
> > > both?) of those patches has/have an effect?
> > >
> > > patch 1: make rawpower __u16
> >
> > Thanks for the quick fix! It works (build log follows).
> >
> > wfg@bee ~/tip/obj-compiletest% make drivers/net/wireless/p54/
> > /usr/bin/make -j40 -C source O=/home/wfg/tip/obj-compiletest ARCH=powerpc
> > CROSS_COMPILE=/usr/local/gcc-4.6.3-nolibc/powerpc64-linux/bin/powerpc64-linux- -j32
> > drivers/net/wireless/p54/
> OT: why is there a "-j40" (after make) and "-j32" (after CROSS_COMPILE)
> in the command line? Isn't one -jXY enough anymore?
Err, one is from shell alias, another is added by the script.. It's a
bit awkward, but there are situations that one cannot cover the other,
and in the cases they both take effect, the last one will take effect.
> > CC [M] drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.o
> [...]
> > LD [M] drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54common.o
> > make: Leaving directory `/c/wfg/tip'
> > wfg@bee ~/tip/obj-compiletest% ..
> > wfg@bee ~/tip% q pop
> > Removing patch patches/mutt-wfg-t420-1000-8534-5234451332105763812
> > Restoring drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c
> >
> Is this patch 1, or patch 2... or both?
It's the only applied patch (and is from you).
Thanks,
Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-11 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20120811084404.GA7755@localhost>
2012-08-11 9:49 ` [wireless-testing:master 68/100] drivers/net/wireless/p54/eeprom.c:291:15: warning: comparison o Christian Lamparter
2012-08-11 9:59 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-11 10:29 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-08-11 10:41 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2012-08-11 10:57 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-08-11 11:05 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-11 11:09 ` [PATCH] p54: fix powerpc gcc warnings Christian Lamparter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120811104133.GA9132@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).