From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:10:01 +0000
Subject: Re: [staging:staging-next 70/73] drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/amplc_dio200.c:1444:2: error: implic
Message-Id: <20120815141001.GA23164@kroah.com>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <502B71C7.4010005@mev.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <502B71C7.4010005@mev.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:07:36PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > Well it looks like my patches got applied in the wrong order (1, 3,
> > > 2) on Greg's staging-next branch, but as long as all 3 patches are
> > > applied it ought to compile okay.
> > 
> > Argh, I did?  Sorry about that.  Nothing I can do about it now :(
> 
> No problem. That reminds me to mark the staging-next branch as
> non-rebaseable (which means the test system will silently ignore
> intermediate errors in that branch).
> 
> Perhaps usb-next is non-rebaseable as well.

It shouldn't be, I hopefully do not mess up like this often.

Wait, what do you mean by "non-rebaseable"?  I think you mean
"non-bisectable" right?

greg k-h