kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [kvm:queue 41/42] arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c:428:12: warning: ignoring return value of 'vcpu_load', d
@ 2012-09-20  0:16 Fengguang Wu
  2012-09-20  5:22 ` [kvm:queue 41/42] arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c:428:12: warning: ignoring return value of 'vcpu_load Michael S. Tsirkin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2012-09-20  0:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: Yuanhan Liu, kernel-janitors, Marcelo Tosatti, kvm

Hi Michael,

FYI, there are new compile warnings show up in

tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git queue
head:   879238fecc051d95037ae76332916209a7770709
commit: 9fc77441e5e1bf80b794cc546d2243ee9f4afb75 [41/42] KVM: make processes waiting on vcpu mutex killable
config: s390-defconfig

All error/warnings:

arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c: In function 'kvm_s390_handle_wait':
arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c:428:12: warning: ignoring return value of 'vcpu_load', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]

vim +428 arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
   418		add_wait_queue(&vcpu->arch.local_int.wq, &wait);
   419		while (list_empty(&vcpu->arch.local_int.list) &&
   420			list_empty(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->list) &&
   421			(!vcpu->arch.local_int.timer_due) &&
   422			!signal_pending(current)) {
   423			set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
   424			spin_unlock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
   425			spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
   426			vcpu_put(vcpu);
   427			schedule();
 > 428			vcpu_load(vcpu);
   429			spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
   430			spin_lock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
   431		}
   432		__unset_cpu_idle(vcpu);
   433		__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
   434		remove_wait_queue(&vcpu->arch.local_int.wq, &wait);
   435		spin_unlock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
   436		spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
   437		hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&vcpu->arch.ckc_timer);
   438		return 0;

---
0-DAY kernel build testing backend         Open Source Technology Centre
Fengguang Wu, Yuanhan Liu                              Intel Corporation

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [kvm:queue 41/42] arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c:428:12: warning: ignoring return value of 'vcpu_load
  2012-09-20  0:16 [kvm:queue 41/42] arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c:428:12: warning: ignoring return value of 'vcpu_load', d Fengguang Wu
@ 2012-09-20  5:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
  2012-09-27 15:02   ` Christian Borntraeger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2012-09-20  5:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fengguang Wu; +Cc: Yuanhan Liu, kernel-janitors, Marcelo Tosatti, kvm

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 08:16:08AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> FYI, there are new compile warnings show up in
> 
> tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git queue
> head:   879238fecc051d95037ae76332916209a7770709
> commit: 9fc77441e5e1bf80b794cc546d2243ee9f4afb75 [41/42] KVM: make processes waiting on vcpu mutex killable
> config: s390-defconfig
> 
> All error/warnings:
> 
> arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c: In function 'kvm_s390_handle_wait':
> arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c:428:12: warning: ignoring return value of 'vcpu_load', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
> 
> vim +428 arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>    418		add_wait_queue(&vcpu->arch.local_int.wq, &wait);
>    419		while (list_empty(&vcpu->arch.local_int.list) &&
>    420			list_empty(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->list) &&
>    421			(!vcpu->arch.local_int.timer_due) &&
>    422			!signal_pending(current)) {
>    423			set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>    424			spin_unlock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
>    425			spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
>    426			vcpu_put(vcpu);
>    427			schedule();
>  > 428			vcpu_load(vcpu);
>    429			spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
>    430			spin_lock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
>    431		}
>    432		__unset_cpu_idle(vcpu);
>    433		__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>    434		remove_wait_queue(&vcpu->arch.local_int.wq, &wait);
>    435		spin_unlock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
>    436		spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
>    437		hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&vcpu->arch.ckc_timer);
>    438		return 0;


Thanks for the report.  This is because vcpu_load can now fail if task
is being killed.  I'm guessing the following is the right fix but have
no way to tell. Warning: completely untested.

--->

kvm/arm: handle vcpu_load failure gracefully

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

-- 

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
index b7bc1aa..5aedf25 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
@@ -362,6 +362,7 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_wait(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	u64 now, sltime;
 	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
+	int ret;
 
 	vcpu->stat.exit_wait_state++;
 	if (kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(vcpu))
@@ -407,7 +408,9 @@ no_timer:
 		spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
 		vcpu_put(vcpu);
 		schedule();
-		vcpu_load(vcpu);
+		ret = vcpu_load(vcpu);
+		if (ret)
+			goto cancel;
 		spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
 		spin_lock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
 	}
@@ -416,6 +419,7 @@ no_timer:
 	remove_wait_queue(&vcpu->arch.local_int.wq, &wait);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
 	spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
+cancel:
 	hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&vcpu->arch.ckc_timer);
 	return 0;
 }

> ---
> 0-DAY kernel build testing backend         Open Source Technology Centre
> Fengguang Wu, Yuanhan Liu                              Intel Corporation

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [kvm:queue 41/42] arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c:428:12: warning: ignoring return value of 'vcpu_load
  2012-09-20  5:22 ` [kvm:queue 41/42] arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c:428:12: warning: ignoring return value of 'vcpu_load Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2012-09-27 15:02   ` Christian Borntraeger
  2012-09-27 15:12     ` Avi Kivity
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2012-09-27 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael S. Tsirkin
  Cc: Fengguang Wu, Yuanhan Liu, kernel-janitors, Marcelo Tosatti, kvm,
	Avi Kivity, Heiko Carstens

On 20/09/12 07:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 08:16:08AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> FYI, there are new compile warnings show up in
>>
>> tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git queue
>> head:   879238fecc051d95037ae76332916209a7770709
>> commit: 9fc77441e5e1bf80b794cc546d2243ee9f4afb75 [41/42] KVM: make processes waiting on vcpu mutex killable
>> config: s390-defconfig
>>
>> All error/warnings:
>>
>> arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c: In function 'kvm_s390_handle_wait':
>> arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c:428:12: warning: ignoring return value of 'vcpu_load', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
>>
>> vim +428 arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>>    418		add_wait_queue(&vcpu->arch.local_int.wq, &wait);
>>    419		while (list_empty(&vcpu->arch.local_int.list) &&
>>    420			list_empty(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->list) &&
>>    421			(!vcpu->arch.local_int.timer_due) &&
>>    422			!signal_pending(current)) {
>>    423			set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>>    424			spin_unlock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
>>    425			spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
>>    426			vcpu_put(vcpu);
>>    427			schedule();
>>  > 428			vcpu_load(vcpu);
>>    429			spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
>>    430			spin_lock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);

IIRC schedule will do vcpu put/load anyway via the preempt notifiers. So the right fix
is probably to just remove the vcpu_put/load around that schedule.
Will double check and send a patch.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [kvm:queue 41/42] arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c:428:12: warning: ignoring return value of 'vcpu_load
  2012-09-27 15:02   ` Christian Borntraeger
@ 2012-09-27 15:12     ` Avi Kivity
  2012-09-27 15:29       ` [PATCH] s390/kvm: Fix vcpu_load handling in interrupt code Christian Borntraeger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2012-09-27 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Borntraeger
  Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin, Fengguang Wu, Yuanhan Liu, kernel-janitors,
	Marcelo Tosatti, kvm, Heiko Carstens

On 09/27/2012 05:02 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 20/09/12 07:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 08:16:08AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>>> FYI, there are new compile warnings show up in
>>>
>>> tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git queue
>>> head:   879238fecc051d95037ae76332916209a7770709
>>> commit: 9fc77441e5e1bf80b794cc546d2243ee9f4afb75 [41/42] KVM: make processes waiting on vcpu mutex killable
>>> config: s390-defconfig
>>>
>>> All error/warnings:
>>>
>>> arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c: In function 'kvm_s390_handle_wait':
>>> arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c:428:12: warning: ignoring return value of 'vcpu_load', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
>>>
>>> vim +428 arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>>>    418		add_wait_queue(&vcpu->arch.local_int.wq, &wait);
>>>    419		while (list_empty(&vcpu->arch.local_int.list) &&
>>>    420			list_empty(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->list) &&
>>>    421			(!vcpu->arch.local_int.timer_due) &&
>>>    422			!signal_pending(current)) {
>>>    423			set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>>>    424			spin_unlock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
>>>    425			spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
>>>    426			vcpu_put(vcpu);
>>>    427			schedule();
>>>  > 428			vcpu_load(vcpu);
>>>    429			spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
>>>    430			spin_lock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
> 
> IIRC schedule will do vcpu put/load anyway via the preempt notifiers. So the right fix
> is probably to just remove the vcpu_put/load around that schedule.
> Will double check and send a patch.

Yes, this is correct.  On a preemptible kernel this happens all the time.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] s390/kvm: Fix vcpu_load handling in interrupt code
  2012-09-27 15:12     ` Avi Kivity
@ 2012-09-27 15:29       ` Christian Borntraeger
  2012-09-27 16:20         ` Avi Kivity
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2012-09-27 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marcelo Tosatti, Avi Kivity
  Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin, Fengguang Wu, Yuanhan Liu, kernel-janitors,
	kvm, Heiko Carstens, Christian Borntraeger

Recent changes (KVM: make processes waiting on vcpu mutex killable)
now requires to check the return value of vcpu_load. This triggered
a warning in s390 specific kvm code. Turns out that we can actually
remove the put/load, since schedule will do the right thing via
the preempt notifiers.

Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c |    2 --
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
index 7556231..ff1e2f8 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
@@ -423,9 +423,7 @@ no_timer:
 		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 		spin_unlock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
 		spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
-		vcpu_put(vcpu);
 		schedule();
-		vcpu_load(vcpu);
 		spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock);
 		spin_lock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
 	}
-- 
1.7.0.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] s390/kvm: Fix vcpu_load handling in interrupt code
  2012-09-27 15:29       ` [PATCH] s390/kvm: Fix vcpu_load handling in interrupt code Christian Borntraeger
@ 2012-09-27 16:20         ` Avi Kivity
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2012-09-27 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Borntraeger
  Cc: Marcelo Tosatti, Michael S. Tsirkin, Fengguang Wu, Yuanhan Liu,
	kernel-janitors, kvm, Heiko Carstens

On 09/27/2012 05:29 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Recent changes (KVM: make processes waiting on vcpu mutex killable)
> now requires to check the return value of vcpu_load. This triggered
> a warning in s390 specific kvm code. Turns out that we can actually
> remove the put/load, since schedule will do the right thing via
> the preempt notifiers.

Thanks, applied.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-27 16:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-09-20  0:16 [kvm:queue 41/42] arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c:428:12: warning: ignoring return value of 'vcpu_load', d Fengguang Wu
2012-09-20  5:22 ` [kvm:queue 41/42] arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c:428:12: warning: ignoring return value of 'vcpu_load Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-27 15:02   ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-09-27 15:12     ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-27 15:29       ` [PATCH] s390/kvm: Fix vcpu_load handling in interrupt code Christian Borntraeger
2012-09-27 16:20         ` Avi Kivity

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).