From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesper Nilsson Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 20:26:57 +0000 Subject: Re: drivers/net/cris/eth_v10.c:1715:2: error: too many arguments to function 'e100rxtx_interrupt' Message-Id: <20121003202656.GT1390@axis.com> List-Id: References: <20120928130608.GA5158@localhost> <20121003104652.GK1390@axis.com> <20121003.144040.1719867946304137902.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20121003.144040.1719867946304137902.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: David Miller Cc: "fengguang.wu@intel.com" , "kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 08:40:40PM +0200, David Miller wrote: > From: Jesper Nilsson > Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 12:46:52 +0200 > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 03:06:08PM +0200, Fengguang Wu wrote: > >> Hi Jesper, > > > > Hi! > > > >> FYI, a rather old build bug that's introduced by > >> > >> bafef0a cris build fixes: update eth_v10.c ethernet driver > >> > >> All error/warnings: > >> > >> drivers/net/cris/eth_v10.c: In function 'e100_netpoll': > >> drivers/net/cris/eth_v10.c:1715:2: error: too many arguments to function 'e100rxtx_interrupt' > >> drivers/net/cris/eth_v10.c:1131:1: note: declared here > > > > Yep, I can't figure out why the followup patches never reached mainline, > > but we have fixes for exactly that in our in-house tree. > > I'll push some move patches after this merge window. > > It's a bug fix, even worse a build fix, why want until after the merge > window? Aye, true, I'll just have to make sure I don't get any other change from the inhouse tree. /^JN - Jesper Nilsson -- Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nilsson@axis.com