From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 14:26:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [remoteproc:for-next 6/9] remoteproc_virtio.c:(.text+0x238e7e): undefined reference to `vring_tr Message-Id: <20121009142644.GD4587@mwanda> List-Id: References: <20121001024544.GA12711@localhost> <81C3A93C17462B4BBD7E272753C1057923BD9B59E3@EXDCVYMBSTM005.EQ1STM.local> <20121009132847.GC4587@mwanda> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ohad Ben-Cohen Cc: Sjur BRENDELAND , Fengguang Wu , "Linus Walleij (linus.walleij@linaro.org)" , "kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 04:15:15PM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > Unless there is a good reason why > > That's what I'm asking. Is there an inherent coupling with some > platform/architecture ? E.g., OMAP remote processors only go with > OMAP chips. If it already compiles fine on x86 then there is no advantage to disabling it. regards, dan carpenter