From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fengguang Wu Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:55:08 +0000 Subject: Re: drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c:580:5: sparse: symbol 'radeon_vm_evict' was not declared. S Message-Id: <20121017165508.GA13934@localhost> List-Id: References: <20121017064444.GA17885@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20121017064444.GA17885@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Alex, On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 04:41:52PM +0000, Deucher, Alexander wrote: > Fengguang, > > Do you want to send a formal patch, or should I just fix in my next radeon -fixes pull request? Since it's a trivial fix, would you just fix it in your tree? Thanks, Fengguang > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Christian König [mailto:deathsimple@vodafone.de] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:26 AM > > To: Fengguang Wu > > Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org; Deucher, Alexander; Cherkasov, Dmitrii > > Subject: Re: drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c:580:5: sparse: symbol > > 'radeon_vm_evict' was not declared. Should it be static? > > > > Hi Fengguang, > > > > yes that's correct the function should be static. > > > > Cheers, > > Christian. > > > > On 17.10.2012 08:44, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > Hi Christian, > > > > > > FYI, there are new sparse warnings show up in > > > > > > tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux master > > > head: 8d2b6b3ae280dcf6f6c7a95623670a57cdf562ed > > > commit: 90a51a329258e3c868f6f4c1fb264ca01c590c57 drm/radeon: allocate > > page tables on demand v4 > > > date: 2 days ago > > > > > > + drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c:580:5: sparse: symbol > > 'radeon_vm_evict' was not declared. Should it be static? > > > > > > vim +580 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c > > > > > > 09db8644 Alex Deucher 2012-07-17 569 /** > > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09 570 * radeon_vm_evict - evict page > > table to make room for new one > > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09 571 * > > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09 572 * @rdev: radeon_device pointer > > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09 573 * @vm: VM we want to allocate > > something for > > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09 574 * > > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09 575 * Evict a VM from the lru, making > > sure that it isn't @vm. (cayman+). > > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09 576 * Returns 0 for success, - > > ENOMEM for failure. > > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09 577 * > > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09 578 * Global and local mutex must be > > locked! > > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09 579 */ > > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09 @580 int radeon_vm_evict(struct > > radeon_device *rdev, struct radeon_vm *vm) > > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09 581 { > > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09 582 struct radeon_vm *vm_evict; > > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09 583 > > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09 584 if (list_empty(&rdev- > > >vm_manager.lru_vm)) > > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09 585 return -ENOMEM; > > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09 586 > > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09 587 vm_evict > > list_first_entry(&rdev->vm_manager.lru_vm, > > > 90a51a32 Christian König 2012-10-09 588 > > struct radeon_vm, list); > > > > > > Shall we apply the attached diff? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Fengguang > > >