From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:34:40 +0000
Subject: Re: a dedicated list for build error reports?
Message-Id: <20121022093440.GA9625@localhost>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20121018130146.GA11433@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20121018130146.GA11433@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:23:52PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:18:20PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > 
> > Good idea. I can do the summary if the too many reports are a problem
> > for the list.
> 
> I would do fine with the summary as well.  Perhaps if I could add a
> procmail filter so it would go into its own mailbox.  I would modify
> my scripts to grep for the error before sending a dublicate report.

That's definitely a good use of the summary. :)

> The thing about the reports are that it's not actually anything that
> janitors can help out with.  Normally it's in some tree that no one
> has and the author takes care of the fix.

Good point. I'll remove kernel-janitors from the CC list.

Thanks,
Fengguang