kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
	Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, rja@americas.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, UV: integer wrap bug in uv_hub_ipi_value()
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:48:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121120004834.GE5060@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121117151611.GB16900@elgon.mountain>

On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 06:16:11PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This is a static checker fix.  The problem is that we store the bits
> from "uv_apicid_hibits" into "apicid" (the high 16 bits) but then we
> shift it 16 bit to the left.  "apicid" is an int so it wraps and we lose
> them.

Is this the complete patch?  phys_apicid is an int, but gets
cast as unsigned long.  Doesn't phys_apicid also have to be
changed to unsigned long?  And why ulong instead of uint (on x86_64)?

I agree with changing signed to unsigned where appropriate, but
this looks like a partial fix.  Am I missing something?

Thanks.

> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> This is for an SGI product, and I can't test it.
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_hub.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_hub.h
> index 21f7385..f3a0f91 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_hub.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_hub.h
> @@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ static inline void uv_set_cpu_scir_bits(int cpu, unsigned char value)
>  }
>  
>  extern unsigned int uv_apicid_hibits;
> -static unsigned long uv_hub_ipi_value(int apicid, int vector, int mode)
> +static unsigned long uv_hub_ipi_value(ulong apicid, ulong vector, ulong mode)
>  {
>  	apicid |= uv_apicid_hibits;
>  	return (1UL << UVH_IPI_INT_SEND_SHFT) |
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
> index 8cfade9..6d93b2f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
> @@ -194,13 +194,13 @@ static int __cpuinit uv_wakeup_secondary(int phys_apicid, unsigned long start_ri
>  	pnode = uv_apicid_to_pnode(phys_apicid);
>  	phys_apicid |= uv_apicid_hibits;
>  	val = (1UL << UVH_IPI_INT_SEND_SHFT) |
> -	    (phys_apicid << UVH_IPI_INT_APIC_ID_SHFT) |
> +	    ((unsigned long)phys_apicid << UVH_IPI_INT_APIC_ID_SHFT) |
>  	    ((start_rip << UVH_IPI_INT_VECTOR_SHFT) >> 12) |
>  	    APIC_DM_INIT;
>  	uv_write_global_mmr64(pnode, UVH_IPI_INT, val);
>  
>  	val = (1UL << UVH_IPI_INT_SEND_SHFT) |
> -	    (phys_apicid << UVH_IPI_INT_APIC_ID_SHFT) |
> +	    ((unsigned long)phys_apicid << UVH_IPI_INT_APIC_ID_SHFT) |
>  	    ((start_rip << UVH_IPI_INT_VECTOR_SHFT) >> 12) |
>  	    APIC_DM_STARTUP;
>  	uv_write_global_mmr64(pnode, UVH_IPI_INT, val);

-- 
Russ Anderson, OS RAS/Partitioning Project Lead  
SGI - Silicon Graphics Inc          rja@sgi.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-20  0:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-17 15:16 [patch] x86, UV: integer wrap bug in uv_hub_ipi_value() Dan Carpenter
2012-11-20  0:48 ` Russ Anderson [this message]
2012-11-20  4:28   ` Dan Carpenter
2012-11-20  4:55     ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-11-20 11:10     ` Alan Cox
2012-11-20 16:27       ` Russ Anderson
2012-11-20 17:09         ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-11-20 17:07     ` Russ Anderson
2012-11-21  7:39       ` Dan Carpenter
2012-12-02 10:44         ` [patch v2] " Dan Carpenter
2012-12-02 15:33           ` walter harms
2012-12-02 17:28             ` [patch v3] " Dan Carpenter
2012-12-02 17:35               ` Dan Carpenter
2012-12-03  7:58                 ` [patch v4] " Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121120004834.GE5060@sgi.com \
    --to=rja@sgi.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rja@americas.sgi.com \
    --cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).