kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
	Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, rja@americas.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, UV: integer wrap bug in uv_hub_ipi_value()
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 04:28:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121120042855.GE6186@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121120004834.GE5060@sgi.com>

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 06:48:34PM -0600, Russ Anderson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 06:16:11PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > This is a static checker fix.  The problem is that we store the bits
> > from "uv_apicid_hibits" into "apicid" (the high 16 bits) but then we
> > shift it 16 bit to the left.  "apicid" is an int so it wraps and we lose
> > them.
> 
> Is this the complete patch?  phys_apicid is an int, but gets
> cast as unsigned long.  Doesn't phys_apicid also have to be
> changed to unsigned long?  And why ulong instead of uint (on x86_64)?

Uint is 32bit across all arches in linux and unix, according to
wikipedia.  The wakeup_secondary_cpu() function pointer takes an int
so I couldn't change the parameter.

> 
> I agree with changing signed to unsigned where appropriate, but
> this looks like a partial fix.  Am I missing something?
> 

I do feel a little embarrassed that I didn't use "unsigned long"
consistently.  I just used ulong to make the line a bit shorter, but
I could redo it with "unsigned long" if you want.

regards,
dan carpenter



  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-20  4:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-17 15:16 [patch] x86, UV: integer wrap bug in uv_hub_ipi_value() Dan Carpenter
2012-11-20  0:48 ` Russ Anderson
2012-11-20  4:28   ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2012-11-20  4:55     ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-11-20 11:10     ` Alan Cox
2012-11-20 16:27       ` Russ Anderson
2012-11-20 17:09         ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-11-20 17:07     ` Russ Anderson
2012-11-21  7:39       ` Dan Carpenter
2012-12-02 10:44         ` [patch v2] " Dan Carpenter
2012-12-02 15:33           ` walter harms
2012-12-02 17:28             ` [patch v3] " Dan Carpenter
2012-12-02 17:35               ` Dan Carpenter
2012-12-03  7:58                 ` [patch v4] " Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121120042855.GE6186@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rja@americas.sgi.com \
    --cc=rja@sgi.com \
    --cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).