From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:59:15 +0000 Subject: Re: [patch] aoe: use after free in aoedev_by_aoeaddr() Message-Id: <20121210085915.GP6568@mwanda> List-Id: References: <20121207061943.GC18220@elgon.mountain> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ed Cashin Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org" On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 07:20:10AM -0600, Ed Cashin wrote: > On Dec 7, 2012, at 1:19 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > We should return NULL on failure instead of returning a freed pointer. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > > > diff --git a/drivers/block/aoe/aoedev.c b/drivers/block/aoe/aoedev.c > > index e66ccbf..98f2965 100644 > > --- a/drivers/block/aoe/aoedev.c > > +++ b/drivers/block/aoe/aoedev.c > > @@ -461,6 +461,7 @@ aoedev_by_aoeaddr(ulong maj, int min, int do_alloc) > > d->targets = kcalloc(NTARGETS, sizeof(*d->targets), GFP_ATOMIC); > > if (!d->targets) { > > kfree(d); > > + d = NULL; > > goto out; > > } > > d->ntargets = NTARGETS; > > > That looks good, thanks. > > If smatch found that, then I have to figure out what I'm doing wrong, because > I ran sparse and smatch on the latest patch series until they were clean. :/ It's one of the checks which is only enabled with the --spammy option. regards, dan carpenter