From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] perf/x86: prevent some shift wrapping bugs in intel uncore
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 18:34:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130518183452.GA14587@elgon.mountain> (raw)
We're trying to use 64 bit masks but the shifts wrap so we can't use the
high 32 bits. I've fixed this by changing several types to unsigned
long long.
This is a static checker fix. The one change which is clearly needed is
"mask = 0xff << (idx * 8);" where the author obviously intended to use
all 64 bits. The other changes are mostly to silence my static checker.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h
index f952891..47b3d00c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h
@@ -337,10 +337,10 @@
NHMEX_M_PMON_CTL_SET_FLAG_SEL_MASK)
#define NHMEX_M_PMON_ZDP_CTL_FVC_MASK (((1 << 11) - 1) | (1 << 23))
-#define NHMEX_M_PMON_ZDP_CTL_FVC_EVENT_MASK(n) (0x7 << (11 + 3 * (n)))
+#define NHMEX_M_PMON_ZDP_CTL_FVC_EVENT_MASK(n) (0x7ULL << (11 + 3 * (n)))
#define WSMEX_M_PMON_ZDP_CTL_FVC_MASK (((1 << 12) - 1) | (1 << 24))
-#define WSMEX_M_PMON_ZDP_CTL_FVC_EVENT_MASK(n) (0x7 << (12 + 3 * (n)))
+#define WSMEX_M_PMON_ZDP_CTL_FVC_EVENT_MASK(n) (0x7ULL << (12 + 3 * (n)))
/*
* use the 9~13 bits to select event If the 7th bit is not set,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
index 52441a2..c0e356d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
@@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ snbep_pcu_get_constraint(struct intel_uncore_box *box, struct perf_event *event)
(!uncore_box_is_fake(box) && reg1->alloc))
return NULL;
again:
- mask = 0xff << (idx * 8);
+ mask = 0xffULL << (idx * 8);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&er->lock, flags);
if (!__BITS_VALUE(atomic_read(&er->ref), idx, 8) ||
!((config1 ^ er->config) & mask)) {
@@ -1923,7 +1923,7 @@ static u64 nhmex_mbox_alter_er(struct perf_event *event, int new_idx, bool modif
{
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
struct hw_perf_event_extra *reg1 = &hwc->extra_reg;
- int idx, orig_idx = __BITS_VALUE(reg1->idx, 0, 8);
+ u64 idx, orig_idx = __BITS_VALUE(reg1->idx, 0, 8);
u64 config = reg1->config;
/* get the non-shared control bits and shift them */
reply other threads:[~2013-05-18 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130518183452.GA14587@elgon.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox