From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:11:51 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replace min macro with min_t Message-Id: <20140224211151.GJ26722@mwanda> List-Id: References: <530bb134.84ce0e0a.2d96.2b6b@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <530bb134.84ce0e0a.2d96.2b6b@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org It's sort of a lot of work to review all 79 changes... Your patch is correct, but I think you are going to get mixed reactions from maintainers. A lot of them don't like to review cleanups like this. I guess my advice would be to split it up and send it to the friendliest maintainers first and see how they respond then slowly feed it to the other maintainers. When you get to the unfriendliest maintainers you can handle then stop. :P Staging is the friendliest subsystem, but none of these patches touch staging. Maybe wireless and usb. regards, dan carpenter