From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 05:51:46 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC] drop owner assignment from platform_drivers Message-Id: <20141012055146.GA1310@katana> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c" List-Id: References: <20141010072439.GA1741@katana> <20141010083627.GL5182@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20141010182604.GC6075@katana> <2769473.KEN6DZKnT7@wuerfel> <20141011165650.GA1263@katana> <20141011205527.GA30877@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20141011205527.GA30877@kroah.com> To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > I missed the one code path you pointed out, and that should be fixed, > but that doesn't mean that the original patch should be reverted, as it > is the way we want things to be, let's just fix up the bug and move on. OK, that is a clear statement. So, what is your opinion on the original cleanup series removing unnecessary '.owner = THIS_MODULE' lines in drivers? Helpful? Noise? Thanks, Wolfram --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUOhbyAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2rz8QALApWGKZOOzy3XNzFQGGw3Nc YZNbz41KX+OxK+cxcTSQbYKXWVRLUdTUf3iewDFOoTr6ggG2Ra2VyX28mLBUxWUy SXGBOZLQpyNZbsE4KPPjijRInWYtCIrtZofcMkMs72+zWburqkfaQN+sHWnaIqVh sD+TmWNrJHI+ZVYtUAn2LjBmfdN06uCIHOIYxwHG1xmFTkcoTSgQai8Jby8FM6nj L8x/Zud92CFqoFLNCFUmdmXEld5hFcGxXgzUZ+fGAQ4MKBxMGIogZWQHLKsjSfJ9 hzQxDnLJ+cegSLFf2n8aIv2hlBzOXZLSLEmq+r7VUG8L9vKK8Wz89FO3x2cbOXWw ldoOntGQZecQUfJMf2+hQVkcAMfZnLEwK9UdWIwsgVF7sWXa4Z5wW4gpB/fePwUB Yj8nvpkdqLBwkn+SvxfLgU5YtjVgHk4P9b+Ykive2mqYbqK4LLqP78iho5Jxtcu3 4TBDBrBsdpAgC5ABIQSlHmi1yiEPXurbjkA66PuHeSoKKpwDSGDeD9w8+JHtiWyV atkDZckWt0a2qo0XD8TqMlPMWSMR/xn6M+OBAvIiRG/uiLfjcidp5kJgd7+V+R+l Wlg3ddYltl0SjFzxYgtfrVFyKPi5FAkzWIWyUfxzpegmX1A3V/DozRNZkCpZkeqE fVdKjc1TEHTkvzkfn9En =xv9Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c--