From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Norris Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:31:43 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] MTD: Deletion of checks before the function call "iounmap" Message-Id: <20150119203143.GL9759@ld-irv-0074> List-Id: References: <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <54BBE87C.9020705@users.sourceforge.net> <20150119175835.GH9759@ld-irv-0074> <54BD4AB6.70708@users.sourceforge.net> <20150119183057.GI9759@ld-irv-0074> <54BD55F6.6090609@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <54BD55F6.6090609@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Julia Lawall , Kyungmin Park , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 08:07:34PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> I published scripts for static source code analysis in March 2004. ^^ That would be March 2014, not March 2004. > > I didn't ask "when?"; where? > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/5/356 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.coccinelle/3513/ > https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2014-March/000676.html > > Do you get further ideas from this software analysis approach? I suppose. I've gotten the idea that I can generate a ton of patches using an automated tool, not test or research them, possibly add bugs to the kernel, and still get a good percentage of my patches merged. Now, have *you* learned anything from this approach? Brian