kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Quentin Lambert <lambert.quentin@gmail.com>
Cc: Lidza Louina <lidza.louina@gmail.com>,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Staging: dgnc: release the lock before testing for nullity
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 13:36:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150318133651.GS10964@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426684868-24402-1-git-send-email-lambert.quentin@gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:21:08PM +0100, Quentin Lambert wrote:
> The refactoring intrduced in
> c84a083b995b ("Staging: dgnc: Use goto for spinlock release before return")
> inverts the order in which the lock is released and ld is tested for nullity.
> 
> This patch restores the execution flow.
> 

This changelog still doesn't make sense so I took a look at the code.

tty_ldisc_deref() is an unlock function.  So this is a lock ordering
bug.  What makes you think the original ordering was correct?  Who
reported this bug?  What are the effects of this bug?

Please answer the questions and we can work together on a proper fix if
needed.

regards,
dan carpenter


  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-18 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-18 13:21 [PATCH v2] Staging: dgnc: release the lock before testing for nullity Quentin Lambert
2015-03-18 13:36 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2015-03-18 13:43   ` Quentin Lambert
2015-03-18 13:54     ` Dan Carpenter
2015-03-18 13:59       ` Quentin Lambert
2015-03-18 14:03         ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150318133651.GS10964@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lambert.quentin@gmail.com \
    --cc=lidza.louina@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).