From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 09:21:42 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] staging: lustre: lnet: code cleanups Message-Id: <20150522092142.GJ4150@mwanda> List-Id: References: <1432237849-53947-1-git-send-email-shuey@purdue.edu> In-Reply-To: <1432237849-53947-1-git-send-email-shuey@purdue.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mike Shuey Cc: oleg.drokin@intel.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org, lustre-deve@lists.lustre.org On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 03:50:23PM -0400, Mike Shuey wrote: > This patch series cleans up code in staging/lustre/lnet - mostly spacing > and dead function cleanup. Should apply against linux-next 20150518. Why are you sending a v4 of this? We don't actually enjoy reviewing the same patchset over and over... Update: I have investigated and it is because you add a few new patches to this set which were not in the original. Just assume that the original patchset will be merge and send the additional patches as a new set. Also since no one replied to the v3 patchset and Greg has a 5000 patches in between v3 and v4 he will not seen v4 until days after he has applied v3 so it causes confusion. Also you sent a v5 of this patchset but without a v5 label... regards, dan carpenter