From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 18:07:29 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Categorize some long line length checks
Message-Id: <20150523180729.GZ22558@mwanda>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <1432237849-53947-1-git-send-email-shuey@purdue.edu>
 <1432237849-53947-11-git-send-email-shuey@purdue.edu>
 <1432242004.20840.68.camel@perches.com>
 <1432362494.29657.40.camel@perches.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1505231331050.2554@hadrien>
 <1432402012.29657.52.camel@perches.com>
In-Reply-To: <1432402012.29657.52.camel@perches.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, oleg.drokin@intel.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org, lustre-deve@lists.lustre.org, Mike Shuey <shuey@purdue.edu>

I feel like the lustre headers could be fit into 80 characters without
losing very much.

No one uses the complicated options on checkpatch anyway, they just grep
away the warnings they don't like.  Newbies especially don't use them.

regards,
dan carpenter