From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 02:24:56 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] staging: lustre: lnet: code cleanups Message-Id: <20150531022456.GA30873@kroah.com> List-Id: References: <1432237849-53947-1-git-send-email-shuey@purdue.edu> <20150522092142.GJ4150@mwanda> <20150523101428.GX22558@mwanda> <20150523123904.GA12407@sudip-PC> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Michael Shuey Cc: Sudip Mukherjee , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Drokin, Oleg" , HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org, Dan Carpenter , lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:05:27AM -0400, Michael Shuey wrote: > Ah - that explains it. I added additional files to the series, but > simply re-applied the original round of patches. They would've not > been tagged as v4, while the patches pertaining to the newly-modified > files had v4 in the subject. The way you sent these is a mess, I can't sort by subject and apply them properly. Either put the v4 at the front, for all patches, like this: [PATCH v4 01/13] or at the end of the number: [PATCH 01/13 v4] so I can sort them. Please fix up and resend this series, I've dropped it from my queue. thanks, greg k-h