From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Frank Blaschka <frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] vfio: make an array larger
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 18:20:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151104182022.GJ7289@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446656080.3692.112.camel@redhat.com>
Sorry, I should have said that I am on linux-next at the start.
> > -static u8 pci_cap_length[] = {
> > +static u8 pci_cap_length[PCI_CAP_ID_MAX + 1] = {
> > [PCI_CAP_ID_BASIC] = PCI_STD_HEADER_SIZEOF, /* pci config header */
> > [PCI_CAP_ID_PM] = PCI_PM_SIZEOF,
> > [PCI_CAP_ID_AGP] = PCI_AGP_SIZEOF,
>
> This doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. The last entry we define
> is:
>
> [PCI_CAP_ID_AF] = PCI_CAP_AF_SIZEOF,
Yes.
> };
>
> and PCI_CAP_ID_MAX is defined as:
>
> #define PCI_CAP_ID_MAX PCI_CAP_ID_AF
No. I am on linux-next and we appear to have added a new element
beyond PCI_CAP_ID_AF.
#define PCI_CAP_ID_AF 0x13 /* PCI Advanced Features */
#define PCI_CAP_ID_EA 0x14 /* PCI Enhanced Allocation */
#define PCI_CAP_ID_MAX PCI_CAP_ID_EA
>
> So the array is implicitly sized to PCI_CAP_ID_MAX + 1 already, this
> doesn't make it any larger.
In linux-next it makes it larger. But also explicitly using
PCI_CAP_ID_MAX + 1 is cleaner as well as fixing the bug in case we add
more elements later again.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-04 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-04 13:26 [patch] vfio: make an array larger Dan Carpenter
2015-11-04 16:40 ` Joe Perches
2015-11-04 18:23 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-11-04 16:54 ` Alex Williamson
2015-11-04 18:20 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2015-11-04 18:28 ` Alex Williamson
2015-11-09 12:24 ` [patch v2] vfio/pci: " Dan Carpenter
2015-11-10 19:03 ` Alex Williamson
2015-11-04 21:39 ` [patch] vfio: " walter harms
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151104182022.GJ7289@mwanda \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).