From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 08:15:46 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: smsc-ece1099: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in smsc_i2c_probe() Message-Id: <20160111081546.GA14104@x1> List-Id: References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <5682957F.5000604@users.sourceforge.net> <568295DD.3090809@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <568295DD.3090809@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 14:47:40 +0100 >=20 > The variable "ret" will be set to an appropriate value a bit later. > Thus let us omit the explicit initialisation at the beginning. Not sure this change is worth your or my time to be frank. I could understand if you were a first time submitter who was dipping their toe in the water, but for someone with 200+ patches, I really think you should be focusing on less trivial matters. > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring > --- > drivers/mfd/smsc-ece1099.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/smsc-ece1099.c b/drivers/mfd/smsc-ece1099.c > index a4c0df7..bcac488 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/smsc-ece1099.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/smsc-ece1099.c > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static int smsc_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c, > { > struct smsc *smsc; > int devid, rev, venid_l, venid_h; > - int ret =3D 0; > + int ret; > =20 > smsc =3D devm_kzalloc(&i2c->dev, sizeof(struct smsc), > GFP_KERNEL); --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html