From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Liu Bo Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:16:11 +0000 Subject: Re: [patch] Btrfs: clean up an error code in btrfs_init_space_info() Message-Id: <20160113181611.GB13918@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: References: <20160113122117.GB19993@mwanda> In-Reply-To: <20160113122117.GB19993@mwanda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , David Sterba , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 03:21:17PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > If we return 1 here, then the caller treats it as an error and returns > -EINVAL. It causes a static checker warning to treat positive returns > as an error. > > Fixes: 1aba86d67f34 ('Btrfs: fix easily get into ENOSPC in mixed case') > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > --- > I would appreciate a little review here. This patch doesn't change > behavior, but it's possible that we had intended to do something else. > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > index 60cc139..64649f8e 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > @@ -10586,7 +10586,7 @@ int btrfs_init_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) > > disk_super = fs_info->super_copy; > if (!btrfs_super_root(disk_super)) > - return 1; > + return -EINVAL; Thank you for this, Dan. While we're here, I'd suggest to remove this check as tree_root->node has already been readed from btrfs_super_root(). Thanks, -liubo > > features = btrfs_super_incompat_flags(disk_super); > if (features & BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MIXED_GROUPS)