From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 08:00:51 +0000 Subject: Re: [patch] iio: humidity: Remove a stray unlock Message-Id: <20160517080051.GB11011@mwanda> List-Id: References: <20160517073133.GA10872@mwanda> <4586F61A4A291F4DA44D32824E7C0F4023597A48@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4586F61A4A291F4DA44D32824E7C0F4023597A48@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Breana, Tiberiu A" Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , "kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org" On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 07:43:21AM +0000, Breana, Tiberiu A wrote: > That one must have slipped by during development versions. > You might also want to add am2315 in the patch title. Yeah. I'll resend. I obviously just mindlessly cut and pasted that from the earlier patch: Fixes: 0d96d5ead3f7 ('iio: humidity: Add triggered buffer support for AM2315') That patch also has the wrong subject line because it was just copied from the first patch 366a3270c1c5 ('iio: humidity: Add support for AM2315'). And just a few minutes ago I was giving another new driver its own prefix. But even though I thought--more than I should have--about what the author wanted to use as a prefix for his driver, I still probably read his mind incorrectly. In other words, we need to start with the correct prefix from square one: iio: humidity: am2315: Add support for AM2315 regards, dan carpenter