* [PATCH] hrtimer: spelling fixes
@ 2016-06-23 18:50 Pratyush Patel
2016-08-17 20:08 ` John Stultz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pratyush Patel @ 2016-06-23 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tglx; +Cc: linux-kernel, john.stultz, trivial, kernel-janitors
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Patel <pratyushpatel.1995@gmail.com>
---
kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index e99df0f..c7f6f5b 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ static void clock_was_set_work(struct work_struct *work)
static DECLARE_WORK(hrtimer_work, clock_was_set_work);
/*
- * Called from timekeeping and resume code to reprogramm the hrtimer
+ * Called from timekeeping and resume code to reprogram the hrtimer
* interrupt device on all cpus.
*/
void clock_was_set_delayed(void)
@@ -1241,7 +1241,7 @@ static void __run_hrtimer(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base,
/*
* Note: We clear the running state after enqueue_hrtimer and
- * we do not reprogramm the event hardware. Happens either in
+ * we do not reprogram the event hardware. Happens either in
* hrtimer_start_range_ns() or in hrtimer_interrupt()
*
* Note: Because we dropped the cpu_base->lock above,
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] hrtimer: spelling fixes
2016-06-23 18:50 [PATCH] hrtimer: spelling fixes Pratyush Patel
@ 2016-08-17 20:08 ` John Stultz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: John Stultz @ 2016-08-17 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pratyush Patel; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner, lkml, Jiri Kosina, kernel-janitors
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Pratyush Patel
<pratyushpatel.1995@gmail.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Patel <pratyushpatel.1995@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> index e99df0f..c7f6f5b 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> @@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ static void clock_was_set_work(struct work_struct *work)
> static DECLARE_WORK(hrtimer_work, clock_was_set_work);
>
> /*
> - * Called from timekeeping and resume code to reprogramm the hrtimer
> + * Called from timekeeping and resume code to reprogram the hrtimer
> * interrupt device on all cpus.
> */
> void clock_was_set_delayed(void)
> @@ -1241,7 +1241,7 @@ static void __run_hrtimer(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base,
>
> /*
> * Note: We clear the running state after enqueue_hrtimer and
> - * we do not reprogramm the event hardware. Happens either in
> + * we do not reprogram the event hardware. Happens either in
> * hrtimer_start_range_ns() or in hrtimer_interrupt()
> *
> * Note: Because we dropped the cpu_base->lock above,
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Queued. Thanks for sending this.
thanks
-john
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-08-17 20:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-06-23 18:50 [PATCH] hrtimer: spelling fixes Pratyush Patel
2016-08-17 20:08 ` John Stultz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).