* [bug report] fs/block_dev.c: add bdev_read_page() and bdev_write_page()
@ 2016-08-04 14:02 Dan Carpenter
2016-09-15 8:56 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-09-15 9:11 ` Dan Carpenter
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2016-08-04 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-janitors
Hello Matthew Wilcox,
The patch 47a191fd38eb: "fs/block_dev.c: add bdev_read_page() and
bdev_write_page()" from Jun 4, 2014, leads to the following static
checker warning:
include/linux/genhd.h:382 part_inc_in_flight()
warn: buffer overflow 'part->in_flight' 2 <= 72
include/linux/genhd.h
380 static inline void part_inc_in_flight(struct hd_struct *part, int rw)
381 {
382 atomic_inc(&part->in_flight[rw]);
^^
This should either be READ or WRITE.
383 if (part->partno)
384 atomic_inc(&part_to_disk(part)->part0.in_flight[rw]);
385 }
444 int bdev_write_page(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
445 struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc)
446 {
447 int result;
448 int rw = (wbc->sync_mode = WB_SYNC_ALL) ? WRITE_SYNC : WRITE;
^^^^^^^^^^
But here we're setting it to WRITE_SYNC.
449 const struct block_device_operations *ops = bdev->bd_disk->fops;
450
451 if (!ops->rw_page || bdev_get_integrity(bdev))
452 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
453 result = blk_queue_enter(bdev->bd_queue, false);
454 if (result)
455 return result;
456
457 set_page_writeback(page);
458 result = ops->rw_page(bdev, sector + get_start_sect(bdev), page, rw);
459 if (result)
460 end_page_writeback(page);
461 else
462 unlock_page(page);
463 blk_queue_exit(bdev->bd_queue);
464 return result;
465 }
regards,
dan carpenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [bug report] fs/block_dev.c: add bdev_read_page() and bdev_write_page()
2016-08-04 14:02 [bug report] fs/block_dev.c: add bdev_read_page() and bdev_write_page() Dan Carpenter
@ 2016-09-15 8:56 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-09-15 9:11 ` Dan Carpenter
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2016-09-15 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-janitors
What happened with this?
regards,
dan carpenter
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:02:06PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Matthew Wilcox,
>
> The patch 47a191fd38eb: "fs/block_dev.c: add bdev_read_page() and
> bdev_write_page()" from Jun 4, 2014, leads to the following static
> checker warning:
>
> include/linux/genhd.h:382 part_inc_in_flight()
> warn: buffer overflow 'part->in_flight' 2 <= 72
>
> include/linux/genhd.h
> 380 static inline void part_inc_in_flight(struct hd_struct *part, int rw)
> 381 {
> 382 atomic_inc(&part->in_flight[rw]);
> ^^
> This should either be READ or WRITE.
>
> 383 if (part->partno)
> 384 atomic_inc(&part_to_disk(part)->part0.in_flight[rw]);
> 385 }
>
>
> 444 int bdev_write_page(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
> 445 struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc)
> 446 {
> 447 int result;
> 448 int rw = (wbc->sync_mode = WB_SYNC_ALL) ? WRITE_SYNC : WRITE;
> ^^^^^^^^^^
> But here we're setting it to WRITE_SYNC.
>
> 449 const struct block_device_operations *ops = bdev->bd_disk->fops;
> 450
> 451 if (!ops->rw_page || bdev_get_integrity(bdev))
> 452 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> 453 result = blk_queue_enter(bdev->bd_queue, false);
> 454 if (result)
> 455 return result;
> 456
> 457 set_page_writeback(page);
> 458 result = ops->rw_page(bdev, sector + get_start_sect(bdev), page, rw);
> 459 if (result)
> 460 end_page_writeback(page);
> 461 else
> 462 unlock_page(page);
> 463 blk_queue_exit(bdev->bd_queue);
> 464 return result;
> 465 }
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [bug report] fs/block_dev.c: add bdev_read_page() and bdev_write_page()
2016-08-04 14:02 [bug report] fs/block_dev.c: add bdev_read_page() and bdev_write_page() Dan Carpenter
2016-09-15 8:56 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2016-09-15 9:11 ` Dan Carpenter
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2016-09-15 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Wilcox; +Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-block, Jens Axboe, Hugh Dickins
Let's try reporting this again to new email addresses...
Btw, belated thanks for creating a linux-block mailing list Jens. :)
regards,
dan carpenter
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:02:06PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Matthew Wilcox,
>
> The patch 47a191fd38eb: "fs/block_dev.c: add bdev_read_page() and
> bdev_write_page()" from Jun 4, 2014, leads to the following static
> checker warning:
>
> include/linux/genhd.h:382 part_inc_in_flight()
> warn: buffer overflow 'part->in_flight' 2 <= 72
>
> include/linux/genhd.h
> 380 static inline void part_inc_in_flight(struct hd_struct *part, int rw)
> 381 {
> 382 atomic_inc(&part->in_flight[rw]);
> ^^
> This should either be READ or WRITE.
>
> 383 if (part->partno)
> 384 atomic_inc(&part_to_disk(part)->part0.in_flight[rw]);
> 385 }
>
>
> 444 int bdev_write_page(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
> 445 struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc)
> 446 {
> 447 int result;
> 448 int rw = (wbc->sync_mode = WB_SYNC_ALL) ? WRITE_SYNC : WRITE;
> ^^^^^^^^^^
> But here we're setting it to WRITE_SYNC.
>
> 449 const struct block_device_operations *ops = bdev->bd_disk->fops;
> 450
> 451 if (!ops->rw_page || bdev_get_integrity(bdev))
> 452 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> 453 result = blk_queue_enter(bdev->bd_queue, false);
> 454 if (result)
> 455 return result;
> 456
> 457 set_page_writeback(page);
> 458 result = ops->rw_page(bdev, sector + get_start_sect(bdev), page, rw);
> 459 if (result)
> 460 end_page_writeback(page);
> 461 else
> 462 unlock_page(page);
> 463 blk_queue_exit(bdev->bd_queue);
> 464 return result;
> 465 }
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-15 9:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-08-04 14:02 [bug report] fs/block_dev.c: add bdev_read_page() and bdev_write_page() Dan Carpenter
2016-09-15 8:56 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-09-15 9:11 ` Dan Carpenter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).