From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cornelia Huck Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 17:40:39 +0000 Subject: Re: Software evolution around scripts for the semantic patch langugae Message-Id: <20160825194039.218e795d.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> List-Id: References: <82b84c9c-38a4-4d17-910f-312668dbae01@users.sourceforge.net> <20160825181009.381411d9.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Christian =?UTF-8?B?Qm9ybnRyw6RnZXI=?= , David Hildenbrand , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , Paolo Bonzini , Radim =?UTF-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , Walter Harms On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 19:34:29 +0200 SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> This issue was detected also by using the Coccinelle software. > > > > Do you have the scripts you use published somewhere? > > I would like to add another view for the corresponding software development. > > The complete answer depends also on the kind of "scripts" > you are looking for. Would you like to clarify any details > a bit more here? You obviously run some kind of semantic patching. It would really help ease review if you could publish the semantic patches that generate your patches - that is probably more helpful in review than just posting the generated patches. And it does not need to be "complete", I'd think everyone on the cc: list here is able to handle a cocchinelle patch, for example.