Re: [PATCH 0/2] Input-at32psif: Fine-tuning for OOM handling in psif_probe()

Joe Perches
2016-07-02T20:45:33Z

On Sat, 2016-07-02 at 21:00 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 20:50:09 +0200
>
> A few update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
>
> Markus Elfring (2):
>   Return directly after a failed kzalloc()
>   Remove two OOM messages
>
>  drivers/input/serio/at32psif.c | 10 +++-------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

What possible rationale is there for including this "references" header?
566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net

This message id is for your message:
"Source code review around jump label usage"
sent December 11, 2015!

Please stop adding unnecessary and useless email headers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html