Re: [PATCH 0/6] mfd: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

Lee Jones
2016-06-28T15:01:41Z

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:25:43 +0200
>
> Several update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
>
> Markus Elfring (6):
> twl-core: Return directly after a failed platform_device_alloc()
> in add_numbered_child()
> twl-core: Refactoring for add_numbered_child()
> dm355evm_msp: Return directly after a failed platform_device_alloc()
> in add_child()
> dm355evm_msp: Refactoring for add_child()
> smsc-ece1099: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation
> in smsc_i2c_probe()
> smsc-ece1099: Return directly after a function failure
> in smsc_i2c_probe()
>
> drivers/mfd/dm355evm_msp.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
> drivers/mfd/smsc-ece1099.c | 11 ++++-------
> drivers/mfd/twl-core.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

What is this set? A different but related one to the set you tagged
it on to? Probably best not to do that. I now have a huge entangled
thread in my inbox, which is going to become out of control rather
quickly (if it isn't already).

--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â”‚ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html