From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cornelia Huck Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:10:09 +0000 Subject: Re: virtio_blk: Less function calls in init_vq() after error detection Message-Id: <20160914101009.6abef9f0.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> List-Id: References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <02054675-8395-ac81-6863-e3a5cbfc9032@users.sourceforge.net> <7da823eb-939c-9ee6-32bf-db296e6a96f6@users.sourceforge.net> <44fd46f6-441a-d497-9157-7e2a0f3f45da@de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <44fd46f6-441a-d497-9157-7e2a0f3f45da@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: SF Markus Elfring , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Minfei Huang , Stefan Hajnoczi , Julia Lawall , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Chao Fan On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:24:58 +0200 Christian Borntraeger wrote: > See, some of your patches are accepted, e.g. the memdup_user changes have usually > been applied by most maintainers including myself. If maintainers won't take other change, > please accept that. If you continue to waste peoples time by discussing "maybe" patches > you actually risk that people will stop taking any patches from you including the "yes" > ones. FWIW, he already gained a place on my ignore list for pestering me offline about his patches and not stopping even when told to do so. So while I won't object if you choose to apply selected patches, I won't comment on any and won't take any (hey, I even won't see them unless someone else replies...)