From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 12:55:25 +0000 Subject: Re: GPU-DRM-TTM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations Message-Id: <20160923125525.GR13620@mwanda> List-Id: References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <4d34446f-05ad-c3ce-5d33-8fb4f25af25c@users.sourceforge.net> <05418fb1-ad66-aba3-bd8c-f6b684a83279@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <05418fb1-ad66-aba3-bd8c-f6b684a83279@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Vetter , Emil Velikov , LKML , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Julia Lawall On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:20:54PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > if you call it "restart" or "lock_restart" doesn't make much difference. > > Do other identifiers fit better to a specification from the document "CodingStyle" > like the following? > > "… > Choose label names which say what the goto does or why the goto exists. > …" > > > Does this wording need any more adjustments? No. I wrote that and "restart" seems like a pretty clear name to me. I never wrote that you should harrass people with your nonsense patches. In fact, I have asked you over and over again to stop. regards, dan carpenter