From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 21:07:37 +0000 Subject: Re: [patch] nvme-fabrics: correct some printk information Message-Id: <20161210210737.GR8244@mwanda> List-Id: References: <20161210090618.GA11680@elgon.mountain> <1481369270.5946.51.camel@perches.com> <20161210184029.GY8176@mwanda> <1481403290.1764.1.camel@perches.com> In-Reply-To: <1481403290.1764.1.camel@perches.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 12:54:50PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > diff -u -p drivers//dma/pxa_dma.c /tmp/nothing//dma/pxa_dma.c > --- drivers//dma/pxa_dma.c > +++ /tmp/nothing//dma/pxa_dma.c > @@ -640,9 +640,6 @@ static unsigned int clear_chan_irq(struc > dcsr = phy_readl_relaxed(phy, DCSR); > phy_writel(phy, dcsr, DCSR); > if ((dcsr & PXA_DCSR_BUSERR) && (phy->vchan)) > - dev_warn(&phy->vchan->vc.chan.dev->device, > - "%s(chan=%p): PXA_DCSR_BUSERR\n", > - __func__, &phy->vchan); That's not a defect. We're getting the address of vchan. I don't get it? regards, dan carpenter