From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Chen Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:49:59 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: misc: usbtest: remove redundant check on retval < 0 Message-Id: <20170213094959.GA1483@b29397-desktop> List-Id: References: <20170212183518.22528-1-colin.king@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: <20170212183518.22528-1-colin.king@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Colin King Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Felipe Balbi , Peter Chen , Alan Stern , Mathias Nyman , Lu Baolu , Chunfeng Yun , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 06:35:18PM +0000, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King > > The check for retval being less than zero is always true since > retval equal to -EPIPE at that point. Replace the existing > conditional with just return retval. > > Detected with CoverityScan, CID#114349 ("Logically dead code") > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King > --- > drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c b/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c > index 3525626..17c0810 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c > @@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ static int ch9_postconfig(struct usbtest_dev *dev) > dev_err(&iface->dev, > "hs dev qualifier --> %d\n", > retval); > - return (retval < 0) ? retval : -EDOM; > + return retval; > } > /* usb2.0 but not high-speed capable; fine */ > } else if (retval != sizeof(struct usb_qualifier_descriptor)) { Reviewed-by: Peter Chen -- Best Regards, Peter Chen