From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:53:50 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] IB/hfi1: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation in hfi1_user_s Message-Id: <20170213105350.GA4108@mwanda> List-Id: References: <8a997282-09c7-0f9f-645e-d7c6e8c79e67@users.sourceforge.net> <477c8499-93ad-253d-aa2b-8f209ecfad62@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <477c8499-93ad-253d-aa2b-8f209ecfad62@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Dennis Dalessandro Cc: SF Markus Elfring , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Doug Ledford , Hal Rosenstock , Mike Marciniszyn , Sean Hefty , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 10:32:59AM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > On 02/10/2017 04:04 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >From: Markus Elfring > >Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 21:01:55 +0100 > > > >Reuse existing functionality from memdup_user() instead of keeping > >duplicate source code. > > > >Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring > > Thanks for the patch, but this one is already taken care of along > with other similar uses of kmalloc/copy: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m8656088729538&w=2 > Michael's patch doesn't change user_sdma_free_request() so it introduces a kfreeing an error pointer bug. regards, dan carpenter