From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:22:01 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: Remove an unneeded condition Message-Id: <20170323092201.GL32449@mwanda> List-Id: References: <20170321204348.GD22118@mwanda> In-Reply-To: <20170321204348.GD22118@mwanda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 09:15:16AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:34:26 +0300 > Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 07:55:38AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 23:43:48 +0300 > > > Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > > > > > We know that "addr" is non-NULL here so there is no need to check if > > > > "addr + offset" is NULL. > > > > > > What about "UINT_MAX - addr + 1 = offset" case on 32bit arch ? :) > > > > > > > I think if that's really possible then we are so screwed that a NULL > > check won't help? > > Fair enough. Even if the addr is not NULL, that could be out of text area. > Could you add that to patch description, and also clean up the whole > function? It seems "invalid" label is no more needed. Sure. I'll resend. regards, dan carpenter