From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 12:16:43 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: max3421: unlock on error in max3421_hub_control()
Message-Id: <20171027121643.2ep2fryouzkrffjl@mwanda>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20171027062620.emm5wwdv73kjjpvl@mwanda>
In-Reply-To: <20171027062620.emm5wwdv73kjjpvl@mwanda>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 02:08:38PM +0200, Jules Maselbas wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:06:36AM +0200, Jules Maselbas wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> > We can't return directly in max3421_hub_control(), we have to unlock
> >> > first.
> >> Yes you are right.
> >> I think testing if pdata is null is not necessary as driver_probe will fail if
> >> the device do not have a platform_data.
> >> 
> > 
> > In that case, let's drop my patch.  Could you send a patch for which
> > removes the NULL check and add a Reported-by: for me?
> It is already in the v2 (and v3) of my initial patch.
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg199901.html
> 
> Should I make a brand new patch (not another version)?

Yeah.  Greg never rebases once the tree has been shared with the public
so you'll need to send a new patch instead of a v3.

regards,
dan carpenter