From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net,
nfarnesi4@gmail.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: sca3000: Fix an error handling path in 'sca3000_probe()'
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 19:17:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180415201755.62a73e7d@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180408194401.18348-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 21:44:01 +0200
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> Use 'devm_iio_kfifo_allocate()' instead of 'iio_kfifo_allocate()' in order
> to simplify code and avoid a memory leak in an error path in
> 'sca3000_probe()'. A call to 'sca3000_unconfigure_ring()' was missing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
for the autobuilders to play with it.
I thought about queueing this up as a fix, but as it is unlikely
to be hit and there is another patch (which isn't a fix) dependent
on it I went with the worst of both worlds and took it for the next
merge window whilst marking it for stable.
I added a note to the description to say why for when people see
it next cycle
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> v2: Use a devm_ function to fix the leak reported in v1.
> This makes 'sca3000_unconfigure_ring()' useless and simplify code.
> ---
> drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c | 9 +--------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c b/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c
> index f33dadf7b262..562f125235db 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c
> @@ -1277,7 +1277,7 @@ static int sca3000_configure_ring(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> {
> struct iio_buffer *buffer;
>
> - buffer = iio_kfifo_allocate();
> + buffer = devm_iio_kfifo_allocate(&indio_dev->dev);
> if (!buffer)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -1287,11 +1287,6 @@ static int sca3000_configure_ring(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void sca3000_unconfigure_ring(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> -{
> - iio_kfifo_free(indio_dev->buffer);
> -}
> -
> static inline
> int __sca3000_hw_ring_state_set(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, bool state)
> {
> @@ -1546,8 +1541,6 @@ static int sca3000_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
> if (spi->irq)
> free_irq(spi->irq, indio_dev);
>
> - sca3000_unconfigure_ring(indio_dev);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-15 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-08 19:44 [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: sca3000: Fix an error handling path in 'sca3000_probe()' Christophe JAILLET
2018-04-15 19:17 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180415201755.62a73e7d@archlinux \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfarnesi4@gmail.com \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).