From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 05:25:04 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD
Message-Id: <20181229052504.GA16315@magnolia>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <1545555435-24576-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
 <CAKR_QVJefW1vxYb7-qiU8=0YdbFghYo15SK2eGjOC-dntRfyYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1812232304130.2940@hadrien>
 <CAKR_QVLeZBL43W4x1mzcfcakSZyyh9L81vgUMxfnSccKawEfdg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181227134055.GA2272@kadam>
In-Reply-To: <20181227134055.GA2272@kadam>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>, Tom Psyborg <pozega.tomislav@gmail.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 04:40:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote:
> > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is
> > more than enough
> > 
> 
> I don't know who you were discussing this with...
> 
> You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists.  That much is a
> clear rule.
> 
> For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one.  I was in
> a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the
> patches".  It depends on the context, of course.  If the patches are
> dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything.

Agreed.  Ms. Lawall, sending "Cover letter + all relevant XFS patches"
(as you did) was exactly the right thing for us xfs types. :)

For that matter, we prefer to receive through linux-xfs more patches
than necessary (one can send the entire series if one is unsure) than to
go wanting for more context.

--D

> If we really have other clear rules, then it should be encoded into
> get_maintainer.pl so that it's automatic.
> 
> My other question is why do the linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> people feel like they need to be CC'd about every driver???  I always
> remove them from the CC list unless it's an arch/arm issue.
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 
> PS:  Please, no more top posting.
>