From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 09:46:15 +0000 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: don't allow negative ->write_io_size_bits Message-Id: <20190213094615.GE5458@kadam> List-Id: References: <20190211184514.GA22212@kadam> <8f0cfae7-eb14-5e94-ad49-cfae222ce553@huawei.com> <05f4eed5-8b71-e97f-464a-72f8c5ae804d@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <05f4eed5-8b71-e97f-464a-72f8c5ae804d@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Chao Yu Cc: Jaegeuk Kim , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 04:49:57PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2019/2/13 11:32, Chao Yu wrote: > > On 2019/2/12 2:45, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >> We put an upper bound on ->write_io_size_bits but we don't have a lower > >> bound. > > > > Oh, lower bound, I think there are more cases didn't consider that, > > let me check it. > > Sorry, one missing case: > > Shouldn't it be: > > if (arg <= 0 || arg > __ilog2_u32(BIO_MAX_PAGES)) { > ^ It wouldn't be hard for me to redo my patch, but I don't know enough to say if zero is invalid and I don't want to get blamed for that... Can you do it, since you're better able to test the change? So let's drop this patch, and then could you give me Reported-by credit instead? regards, dan carpenter