From: "Michał Pecio" <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
To: Su Hui <suhui@nfschina.com>
Cc: mathias.nyman@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: xhci: print xhci->xhc_state when queue_command failed
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 12:03:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250725120329.2b6e3813@foxbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250725060117.1773770-1-suhui@nfschina.com>
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 14:01:18 +0800, Su Hui wrote:
> When encounters some errors like these:
> xhci_hcd 0000:4a:00.2: xHCI dying or halted, can't queue_command
> xhci_hcd 0000:4a:00.2: FIXME: allocate a command ring segment
> usb usb5-port6: couldn't allocate usb_device
>
> It's hard to know whether xhc_state is dying or halted.
Is it truly a problem? This is the only place which sets
XHCI_STATE_DYING that I found in the whole drivers/ tree:
xhci_err(xhci, "xHCI host controller not responding, assume dead\n");
xhci->xhc_state |= XHCI_STATE_DYING;
And AFAIK such state can only be exited by unbinding the driver.
Are there really cases when it's unclear if the HC is dying or not?
> So it's better to print xhc_state's value which can help locate the
> resaon of the bug.
Hmm, any chance you came across bugs that upstream should know about?
Regards,
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-25 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-25 3:13 [PATCH] usb: xhci: print xhci->xhc_state when queue_command failed Su Hui
2025-07-25 4:43 ` Greg KH
2025-07-25 5:11 ` Su Hui
2025-07-25 6:01 ` [PATCH v2] " Su Hui
2025-07-25 8:50 ` Greg KH
2025-07-25 10:03 ` Michał Pecio [this message]
2025-07-25 11:32 ` Su Hui
2025-07-26 9:11 ` Michał Pecio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250725120329.2b6e3813@foxbook \
--to=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=suhui@nfschina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox