From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f51.google.com (mail-wm1-f51.google.com [209.85.128.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C87403101D4 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 21:21:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.51 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761859316; cv=none; b=oKkGe6CqcnxZiSlyioj2g0WgXwf7c12tiVZdrGiSwWRYFOP/6zKLdJ/GOhtaz9wLBAUqS2Q0Bssgn7zY31/ipLP1WM/GXkgTtRUTs9AWTK+xpicWr0w4/hRsHZbPufOCdCIIBT0j8vJiWUZjQQCNteLt25x3LmvfISXUIGCCEDs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761859316; c=relaxed/simple; bh=41yO0rIy9bUDs+0nOWpnQwIwChMHRHfPwl3EMAqji84=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NXW1lT2qpEZK63hBNU1AxXgzvZZs1Ia0NS0woFGIY79Sb2BfMyEFOj82mpDLWHoVSDz1OQu4oo+r9EnLbd0B2xQsWBBos6/9iDCFiGTsxS7VKJBoM6Hy+eYKJn15rcHloaTNDqZHpq0PfJGSjYGW6jEuJf92/tWmm8gmGnenbrI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=b3uG3RpU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="b3uG3RpU" Received: by mail-wm1-f51.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-47721743fd0so8460305e9.2 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 14:21:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1761859313; x=1762464113; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=C3xUY9h0KJ8iAZKk6ldG2UouJ9y8peB0TN173ET5ZQ0=; b=b3uG3RpUN08X+DBJDKu7yS6odt+XdhWYZkched+r5U5cu4wl82rGTJ7zcgOe6s65SB CHJPYnEL9+EsdeKwyvCr6ftzvymNwxGeC38tDYaISUvLUlHTGME5QnooHbjTgAGNZSpk FnQ+HGz2I33/qKs9DBpm4+3hiMT9LOayyNjX0LIsyTBtf1UeoJLKoSKRhL1BwqX+o7dH FSpnq9PAwKqolYdWVlmkVb73TxMjddHrzPtAtBvQJ32qPoK5O1z7IMHBXnfGl9mFbOnb H56xW/IdIeU/dvmBrbL+pUQuHEYqVmyeJJdbvdAaeWN5yVBXUkkFVtG5Q2QRTdc0CBXg nOKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1761859313; x=1762464113; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=C3xUY9h0KJ8iAZKk6ldG2UouJ9y8peB0TN173ET5ZQ0=; b=gkEl06O2pE3Xy0V6Uayhn1atO6r3nitQ3Q5a8y/9dnkk4WHqYNG/FcSfu45AS4na+e KbALQxCMPw9SKeAG/+RAll6Wrklf8eU6NLLdiSoy6cgSd4jP/Z+h7jzCw7cMY/aF6UNq GYNNzbPXM0dATaMmwNul1EILzQ+/rVm6NOBFGRWQD8VenDff0km5OiL4ivmJ62p1xdbk txEHt0CxBVrRl61KdVuHBCMIbWmJWnjfXGnn4FvOKiysKbrWr0osD0crv9cNZ+nOKonz VdG2OAAjVqfzeVz5gdxlTgDHMK9qS/2o4wz/yctQTJf8W4wDQaTJYQMnuwGsJJij0evn riCw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUjrMNIzs7qcRdvV2xMmqo9uCPlZLSJ4QlZlfiUEdQ1vGlMwUUZ6nnhXQHbKlvjRJsMYsrfyw+Ln+9aCLGvYeA=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwIl5BEWZ8vEkgfDNlXXVOj7dNxgwT/BdonUybgOw2cJ+MN1lze ATOwNJCbyQ/IgdMJokP5o3SKoAKVo9dEW/LkN6GuyL38l6lEb9xaoN1O X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuarlu0oN2Lq1IiCLLuEaZitCTMjs2SuvDKFBRoo2lEORhs8SbprhwxETKpyK5 F1b/yeRJE1t1Xvreu3ywSSsedn4i16CzBQToEVy+orS5Vnjmc0WL8gEj/xboLlPo3MVepEHUuhO xOdS/Vu/KMghzN9r7Ko2a9s+EHTUI2YzAe3CBGUQq4jmJO1ynoDmV6oLYTPw/oXwwGw+qDB8hGv YMHjnAw5FIFaKs9yl312Kp4WizhW1Ztp+fGdhY+h11xXBgZj0U0GMC0NCnE6NFrsZz8p3iiTQ24 Ur5t48MbdLotXyldt8e8ZERiP4o8oNFb/2v3DKr3BmoJnjyQfl+dDmvUIA54/q6EW78Xap42CcP 3B3CK+u5ZrRqnFiLFsNpV6bp03ZXinwLkZsSTNOqAhSzmCeYqNyfahYlAYSIjl+2+TdmUPdFQko LyqhV9P4E94I0SdTn7PMIo/42VLV+jkAHR72us5DM1IA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHRzVaOlp+5YsC2cfS+t1uX4CV5lhiv1MUcpedd26aU/rB1wa07+4lpdiM8MS3Ql59DtlOQRw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3d9b:b0:46e:4e6d:79f4 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-477307e2946mr11654555e9.15.1761859313090; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 14:21:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pumpkin (82-69-66-36.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.69.66.36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4772fcf439bsm7028125e9.10.2025.10.30.14.21.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 30 Oct 2025 14:21:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 21:21:51 +0000 From: David Laight To: Mark Rutland Cc: Markus Elfring , kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Catalin Marinas , David Brazdil , Joey Gouly , Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , Suzuki Poulouse , Will Deacon , Zenghui Yu , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Miaoqian Lin Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Use pointer from memcpy() call for assignment in init_hyp_mode() Message-ID: <20251030212151.352e9a8a@pumpkin> In-Reply-To: References: <6e962260-5069-490a-89fb-908a4342ccd9@web.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 17:49:51 +0000 Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 06:11:03PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote: > > From: Markus Elfring > > Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 18:01:41 +0100 > > > > A pointer was assigned to a variable. The same pointer was used for > > the destination parameter of a memcpy() call. > > This function is documented in the way that the same value is returned. > > Thus convert two separate statements into a direct variable assignment for > > the return value from a memory copy action. > > > > The source code was transformed by using the Coccinelle software. > > > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring > > --- > > arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c > > index 870953b4a8a7..feab88c31703 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c > > @@ -2600,8 +2600,8 @@ static int __init init_hyp_mode(void) > > goto out_err; > > } > > > > - page_addr = page_address(page); > > - memcpy(page_addr, CHOOSE_NVHE_SYM(__per_cpu_start), nvhe_percpu_size()); > > + page_addr = memcpy(page_address(page), CHOOSE_NVHE_SYM(__per_cpu_start), > > + nvhe_percpu_size()); > > This change makes the code harder to read, and harder to modify. It > saves no space. It might save a register spill - but really isn't worth the effort. memcpy() is really best treated as being 'void'. Indeed most implementations would be better if it were 'void'. Although you could define: #define memcpy(d, s, l) ({ auto _d = d; void_memcpy(_d, s, l); _d}) so that the compiler would optimise away the save that memcpy() typically has to do. I even suspect that memcpy() is an old enough function that the return value is 'what the implementation happened to leave in r0'. David > > As Dan said [1]: > > | No one will thank you for making these changes... :( Please don't do > | it. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aQNsecHJSO2U68Fc@stanley.mountain/ > > Mark. >